THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROGRAM
Untouched Lophophora williamsii in the regrowth study site population
Peyote harvest regrowth –
Summary of our observations in 2010.
PNF – Plant not found.
TNF – Tag not found.
nd – No data.
NP – Not present.
– – Missing data.
Concerning data on regrowth involving multiple pups:
1) There is not necessarily a direct 1:1 correspondence between sequential figures for individual pups within a single plant.
2) It was not uncommon for some or all pups to be partly or entirely covered with soil so some photos may reflect the pre-uncovery state.
Images of the tags can be viewed via the links for the tag numbers and images of the actual plants can be viewed using the links in the columns headed "Regrowth as number of pups".
The following 20 plants (#201-220) were harvested during the November 2008 monitoring to make up for what was then believed to be lost plants from the original group of 50 harvested individuals. The March 2009 data presented below followed a severe drought that lasted throughout the winter and into the spring, up through the date of the March monitoring.
Late harvest adjunct group.
Plant No.
2009
2010 |
Regrowth as
number of pups
or
PNF/NP |
Diameter of pups
(cm)
7 March 2009
6 March 2010
|
Comments
|
| |
201
201 |
0
2 |
nd
2.2, 1.2 |
|
202
202 |
0
2 |
nd
2.3, 2.1 |
Larger 3rd crown that was present is a sister to the harvested plant. |
203
203 |
0
3 |
nd
2.5, 1.5, 1.5 |
|
204
204 |
0
2 |
nd
2.8, 1.9 |
|
205
205 |
0
0 |
nd
nd |
|
206
206 |
1
1 |
2.0
1.8x1.0 |
See Note following table.
Crown mostly eaten; fragmentary remains. |
207
207 |
0
2 |
nd
3.0, 2.0 |
|
208
208 |
PNF
NP |
nd
nd |
Evidently uprooted by feral hogs.
Hogs |
209
209 |
0
2 |
nd
2.5, 1.6 |
|
210
210 |
0
1 |
nd
– |
Plant mistakenly thought dead in 2009 causing missed data. |
211
211 |
0
0 |
nd
nd |
Sister of the harvested plant is still alive. |
212
212 |
0
0 |
nd
nd |
|
213
213
|
0
nd
1 |
nd
nd
nd |
Hog activity evident.
Updated data: 2010 July 26. |
214
214 |
0
4 |
nd
1.8, 1.5, 1.0. 0.5 |
|
215
215 |
0
1 |
nd
3.0 |
Unharvested twin also present. |
216
216 |
0
2 |
nd
1.1, 1.5 |
|
217
217 |
0
3 |
nd
1.5, 1.9, 1.0 |
|
218
218 |
0
0 |
nd
nd |
Sister of the harvested plant is still alive. |
219
219 |
0
2 |
nd
2.5, 2.9 |
|
220
220 |
0
2 |
nd
3.0, 2.5 |
|
Note: In 2009 the sole post-harvest regrowth pup (#206) in this drought-harvested adjunct group was regrowth from an apical meristem, not from a subterranean areole. This apical meristem regrowth was possible only because the crown was removed with a high cut, slightly above ground level, so that the apical meristem remained in the stem of the living plant rather than being removed with the harvested crown.
The data summary for the primary regrowth group.
The data summary for the control group.
Regrowth study site showing typical Tamaulipan thornscrub vegetation
If you would like to help support additional studies of this type, designed to answer basic questions that are critical to the optimal stewardship/management of vulnerable cactus species, please send a contribution, of $25 USD or whatever amount you can afford, to the Cactus Conservation Institute, P.O. Box 561, Alpine, TX 79830.
We also now accept donations via PayPal.
|
|